U.S. Promised Windfalls From Japan Deal. Tokyo Has Other Ideas.

Default image

Tokyo battles critics of the agreement, saying $550 billion in funding for U.S. industry will be almost entirely loans and loan guarantees

A worker held up an edition of a newspaper reporting that President Trump had announced a trade deal with Japan, in Tokyo, last week. Photo: Eugene Hoshiko/Associated Press

TOKYO—Japan is playing down the risks from its trade deal with President Trump after the White House said the U.S. would direct $550 billion in investments by Japan and keep 90% of the profit.

Tokyo’s chief negotiator, Ryosei Akazawa, said Monday that the government bank at the center of the investment deal would strictly review the projects it is asked to finance and approve only those that comply with Japanese law. Critics of the deal have suggested Tokyo would have to follow Trump’s orders on what to fund, potentially threatening the finances of the Japan Bank for International Cooperation, or JBIC.

Over the weekend, Akazawa said that only 1% to 2% of the $550 billion amount would be actual investment, with the rest coming in the form of loans and loan guarantees.

The government is facing a backlash from opposition lawmakers and some analysts who expressed concern that the trade agreement, as described by Trump and the White House, could humiliate Japan.

A White House fact sheet released last week said “Japan will invest $550 billion directed by the United States to rebuild and expand core American industries.” It said “the U.S. will retain 90% of the profits from this investment—ensuring that American workers, taxpayers, and communities reap the overwhelming share of the benefit.”

The investment is part of a trade deal in which Trump agreed to place tariffs of 15% on Japanese goods including cars. Markets welcomed the deal because the 15% rate is lower than the tariffs Japan was already paying on cars and lower than the level Trump had threatened on other goods.

Takahide Kiuchi, a former Bank of Japan policy board member who is now an economist at Nomura Research Institute, said the language about investments didn’t sound like the win-win relationship Japan has been seeking. “It even feels as though Japan’s sovereignty is being infringed upon,” Kiuchi said.

Yoshihiko Noda, the leader of the largest opposition party, said that because of the vagueness of the $550 billion commitment, “differences in interpretation could become a minefield.”

The government of Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba is walking a fine line in responding to the criticism, avoiding direct confrontation with Trump while saying the deal allows Japan to defend its interests. Ishiba is hanging by a thread after an election defeat July 20.

Akazawa, the chief Japanese negotiator, told public broadcaster NHK over the weekend that he expected the investment portion of the deal to come to about 1% to 2% of the $550 billion framework. He also said Japan could stretch the commitment out over the remaining 3½ years of Trump’s term.

A Japanese government fact sheet said government-affiliated financial institutions would handle the $550 billion commitment, not private-sector companies. In general, government institutions such as the JBIC focus on loans and loan guarantees, and direct investment in factories and mines is only a small part of JBIC’s work.

If Japan’s government banks issue loans to U.S.-based projects, they could be expected to earn tens of billions of dollars in interest, said Dai-ichi Life Research Institute economist Hideo Kumano. 

“President Trump’s statement about ‘90% of the profit to the U.S., 10% to Japan’ is purely to draw the attention of his domestic supporters,” Kumano said. The actual deal “doesn’t sound so bad,” he said. 

No formal written version of the trade deal has been released, and key terms of Japan’s commitments including the $550 billion investment deal were unknown.

Akazawa, the negotiator, said he was pushing the U.S. to quickly implement the terms of the deal, and Japan’s finance minister said Monday he expected Trump to sign an executive order this week.

Write to Megumi Fujikawa at megumi.fujikawa@wsj.com and Yang Jie at jie.yang@wsj.com

Copyright ©2025 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 87990cbe856818d5eddac44c7b1cdeb8

The Central Forward Party

The Central Forward Party

The Center Forward Party is a centrist, bipartisan organization focused on advancing practical policy solutions through collaboration and open dialogue. Founded in 2010, it brings together policymakers, industry leaders, and experts to address national challenges, promote informed decision-making, and encourage constructive conversations that bridge political divides while supporting balanced, forward-thinking solutions for communities.

Leave A Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Recent Blogs

What If the Government Ran Like It Actually Had to Answer to You?

Let’s start with a number. Not a political talking point, not a campaign slogan- an actual number that should make every American stop mid-scroll and…

Immigration, Innovation, and the Rule of Law

1. America Is a Nation of Immigrants Every American—directly or indirectly—comes from immigrants. Today, nearly 45 million immigrants live in the United States, representing about…

The 40-Year Exodus: A Generational Manual Override for Middle East Peace

The Middle East remains paralyzed by a “Conflict Loop” that traditional diplomacy has failed to break. The United States continues to oscillate between two ineffective…

The Two-Generation Bridge: Ending the Middle East’s Interest Avalanche

The year 2026 has begun with a terrifying clarity. The joint Israel-U.S. strikes on Iranian strategic sites in late February, followed by the largest cyber-blackout…

The Executive Echo Chamber: Breaking the Cycle of Institutional Cannibalism

When you take into account, the current state of American politics, we are witnessing a phenomenon the Central Forward Party (CFP) identifies as Institutional Cannibalism.…

Latest Insights

Explore our latest articles & updates

October 13, 2025

Sensible Solutions to Current Problems

Our system is broken.  The plan I have outlined is my first guess as to what we need…

Read More →
October 13, 2025

Iran

Trumps handling or Iran was ridiculous. He threated Iran with dropping a bomb to destroy their nuclear facilities.…

Read More →
October 13, 2025

Trump’s Mass Layoffs

His approach to reducing the cost of running our country with mass layoffs is and was ridiculous. Not…

Read More →