U.S. Promised Windfalls From Japan Deal. Tokyo Has Other Ideas.

Default image

Tokyo battles critics of the agreement, saying $550 billion in funding for U.S. industry will be almost entirely loans and loan guarantees

A worker held up an edition of a newspaper reporting that President Trump had announced a trade deal with Japan, in Tokyo, last week. Photo: Eugene Hoshiko/Associated Press

TOKYO—Japan is playing down the risks from its trade deal with President Trump after the White House said the U.S. would direct $550 billion in investments by Japan and keep 90% of the profit.

Tokyo’s chief negotiator, Ryosei Akazawa, said Monday that the government bank at the center of the investment deal would strictly review the projects it is asked to finance and approve only those that comply with Japanese law. Critics of the deal have suggested Tokyo would have to follow Trump’s orders on what to fund, potentially threatening the finances of the Japan Bank for International Cooperation, or JBIC.

Over the weekend, Akazawa said that only 1% to 2% of the $550 billion amount would be actual investment, with the rest coming in the form of loans and loan guarantees.

The government is facing a backlash from opposition lawmakers and some analysts who expressed concern that the trade agreement, as described by Trump and the White House, could humiliate Japan.

A White House fact sheet released last week said “Japan will invest $550 billion directed by the United States to rebuild and expand core American industries.” It said “the U.S. will retain 90% of the profits from this investment—ensuring that American workers, taxpayers, and communities reap the overwhelming share of the benefit.”

The investment is part of a trade deal in which Trump agreed to place tariffs of 15% on Japanese goods including cars. Markets welcomed the deal because the 15% rate is lower than the tariffs Japan was already paying on cars and lower than the level Trump had threatened on other goods.

Takahide Kiuchi, a former Bank of Japan policy board member who is now an economist at Nomura Research Institute, said the language about investments didn’t sound like the win-win relationship Japan has been seeking. “It even feels as though Japan’s sovereignty is being infringed upon,” Kiuchi said.

Yoshihiko Noda, the leader of the largest opposition party, said that because of the vagueness of the $550 billion commitment, “differences in interpretation could become a minefield.”

The government of Prime Minister Shigeru Ishiba is walking a fine line in responding to the criticism, avoiding direct confrontation with Trump while saying the deal allows Japan to defend its interests. Ishiba is hanging by a thread after an election defeat July 20.

Akazawa, the chief Japanese negotiator, told public broadcaster NHK over the weekend that he expected the investment portion of the deal to come to about 1% to 2% of the $550 billion framework. He also said Japan could stretch the commitment out over the remaining 3½ years of Trump’s term.

A Japanese government fact sheet said government-affiliated financial institutions would handle the $550 billion commitment, not private-sector companies. In general, government institutions such as the JBIC focus on loans and loan guarantees, and direct investment in factories and mines is only a small part of JBIC’s work.

If Japan’s government banks issue loans to U.S.-based projects, they could be expected to earn tens of billions of dollars in interest, said Dai-ichi Life Research Institute economist Hideo Kumano. 

“President Trump’s statement about ‘90% of the profit to the U.S., 10% to Japan’ is purely to draw the attention of his domestic supporters,” Kumano said. The actual deal “doesn’t sound so bad,” he said. 

No formal written version of the trade deal has been released, and key terms of Japan’s commitments including the $550 billion investment deal were unknown.

Akazawa, the negotiator, said he was pushing the U.S. to quickly implement the terms of the deal, and Japan’s finance minister said Monday he expected Trump to sign an executive order this week.

Write to Megumi Fujikawa at megumi.fujikawa@wsj.com and Yang Jie at jie.yang@wsj.com

Copyright ©2025 Dow Jones & Company, Inc. All Rights Reserved. 87990cbe856818d5eddac44c7b1cdeb8

The Central Forward Party

The Central Forward Party

The Center Forward Party is a centrist, bipartisan organization focused on advancing practical policy solutions through collaboration and open dialogue. Founded in 2010, it brings together policymakers, industry leaders, and experts to address national challenges, promote informed decision-making, and encourage constructive conversations that bridge political divides while supporting balanced, forward-thinking solutions for communities.

Leave A Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Recent Blogs

What Paying Politicians $174,000 to Manage $32.4 Trillion Is Actually Costing America in 2026

There is a specific kind of financial absurdity that Washington has normalized so thoroughly that most people no longer see it. Let me put the…

Third Party America

Why the 2026 Midterms Are the Last Clear Opportunity to Build the Third Party America Actually Needs

There is a specific quality to political moments that, in retrospect, everyone recognizes as having been the inflection point where the direction of things changed.…

Is America Falling Behind China and India Because Washington Refuses to Think Beyond the Next Election?

In 2026, China is contributing 26.6 percent of global real GDP growth. India is contributing 17 percent. Together, these two Asian economies account for 43.6…

Is America’s Gun Violence Crisis the Most Expensive Policy Failure Nobody in Congress Will Fix in 2026?

I want to start with a number that should be in every major policy conversation about the U.S. economy in 2026 and is almost never…

What Does It Actually Cost America to Have No One Supervising Congressional Bill Drafting in 2026?

I want to tell you two stories from my own career before we get into the data, because these stories are the reason I believe…

Latest Insights

Explore our latest articles & updates

April 9, 2026

What If the Government Ran Like It Actually Had to Answer to You?

Let’s start with a number. Not a political talking point, not a campaign slogan- an actual number that…

Read More →
April 9, 2026

Immigration, Innovation, and the Rule of Law

1. America Is a Nation of Immigrants Every American—directly or indirectly—comes from immigrants. Today, nearly 45 million immigrants…

Read More →
October 13, 2025

Unemployment

Limit unemployment to 6 months unless we are in a recession We should subsidize businesses for hiring people…

Read More →
October 13, 2025

Chinese Tariffs

I would like to keep China as a player in the world economy if we can get them…

Read More →