By The Central Forward Party
There is a concept in my faith-Reform Judaism-called Tikkun Olam, or “repairing the world.” It’s a call to action, a reminder that the world is imperfect and that we, as individuals and as a community, have a sacred obligation to fix the cracks. For too long, I have watched as the political landscape in the United States has become less about repairing the world and more about tearing it apart. We are caught in a tug-of-war between two parties that seem more interested in maintaining their own relevance than in solving the actual problems keeping Americans up at night.
I’m writing this because I believe it’s time for a different path-a “Central Forward” path. As a person of faith, a citizen, and a pragmatist, I see two issues that have been weaponized to divide us, when they should be addressed with compassion and economic common sense: reproductive rights and the cycle of welfare.
The Sacred Right of Choice: A Matter of Faith and Freedom
To me, the current debate over abortion isn’t just a political disagreement; it’s a violation of the very principles this country was founded upon. In Reform Judaism, we are taught that life is sacred, but we also believe in Kavod Ha’Briyot-respect for human dignity. Our tradition has held for centuries that the life and well-being of the mother are paramount.
When I see politicians using their specific religious interpretations to dictate the healthcare of millions, I don’t see “pro-life” values; I see a violation of the separation of church and state. The First Amendment was designed to protect us from a state-mandated religion just as much as it was to protect our right to practice. By turning abortion into a political battlefield, the two-party system has successfully ignored the fact that over 65% of Americans-a clear, resounding majority-believe that abortion should be legal in all or most cases.
I believe we need to pass a federal law that makes abortion a woman’s choice, period. We need to take it out of the hands of extremists and put it back into the hands of the individuals it actually affects. If people want to argue about when life begins, let’s be reasonable: set a standard, perhaps at 20 weeks, that aligns with medical reality and international norms. This is what first-world countries do.
But beyond the theology and the politics, there is a cold, hard economic reality that we ignore at our peril.
The Economic Cost of Denied Rights
When we deny a woman the right to choose, we aren’t just making a moral judgment; we are often sentencing a family to a cycle of poverty. Data consistently shows that state-level abortion restrictions are estimated to cost the U.S. economy over $133 billion annually in lost earnings and increased turnover.
More importantly, it is not fair to the children. When a child is born into a situation where the parents cannot provide, that child often lacks the basic nourishment and stability required for their brain to develop properly. Research from the Waisman Center and other institutions shows that poverty-related stress and lack of nutrition can lead to reduced gray matter in the frontal and temporal lobes-the very areas responsible for learning and executive function.
Our goal should be to lift people up. If we force a cycle of underprivileged existence, we aren’t just “tearing down” the individual; we are creating a permanent class of people who must “take” from the system rather than “pay into” it. By protecting choice, we reduce the long-term strain on welfare and subsidy programs, ultimately lowering our national debt.
Redefining the “Safety Net”: From Welfare to Workforce
This brings me to the second crack in our foundation: our current welfare system. For years, the “progressive” side has focused on expanding benefits, while the “conservative” side has focused on cutting them. Neither has focused on the one thing that actually works: opportunity.
The Central Forward Party believes in a radical, common-sense shift in how we handle welfare. Right now, the system often punishes people for finding work. If you get a job, you lose your benefits, often leaving you worse off than when you started. That is an “incentive gap” that keeps people trapped.
I propose a new “Minimum Income” bridge:
- Keep Your Benefits: We should allow those on welfare to get a job and keep their welfare benefits initially.
- The 50% Rule: To encourage hiring, employers should be able to hire people transitioning from welfare at 50% of the normal wage for that position. This provides businesses with inexpensive labor, which increases corporate profits and generates more tax revenue.
- The Gradual Exit: As the individual earns a wage, their welfare income is reduced by only 50 cents for every dollar earned. This ensures that every hour worked actually results in more money in their pocket.
| Current System | Proposed Central Forward “Bridge” |
| Getting a job can lead to a “benefit cliff” where total income drops. | Benefits are reduced gradually (50% of earnings), ensuring work always pays. |
| High barrier for entry for low-skill workers. | 50% wage incentive makes hiring welfare recipients highly attractive to employers. |
| Perpetual dependence on full state funding. | Goal of reducing welfare costs by 50% over 5 to 10 years as people work their way out. |
By allowing people to work themselves out of poverty while still having a safety net, we move toward a system where the individual becomes a contributor. They only pay taxes on their non-welfare income, giving them a fair shot at building savings.
Breaking the Two-Party Stranglehold
Why haven’t these common-sense solutions been implemented? Because the two-party system thrives on the division. If we solve the abortion issue, the parties lose a primary way to scare their base into voting. If we solve the welfare trap, they lose a primary way to argue about “takers” vs. “makers.”
A third-party presence-a Central Forward movement-makes it impossible for one party to control the vote through fear-mongering. It forces a conversation about results, not rhetoric.
I want to live in an America where we don’t judge each other for the decisions we make about our bodies or our lives, provided those actions don’t damage others. I want an America that invests in the brains of our children and the dignity of our workers. We have the data. We have the philosophy. Now, we just need the courage to move forward.
Contact us today, and let us help you get started!
